1992 Plymouth Colt vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Scion tC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion tC (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Scion tC (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Scion tC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Plymouth Colt | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | Plymouth | Scion |
Model | Colt | tC |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |