1992 Plymouth Colt vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura TL (280 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Acura TL weights approximately 465 kg more than 1992 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Acura TL (344 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Plymouth Colt | 2012 Acura TL | |
Make | Plymouth | Acura |
Model | Colt | TL |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 344 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2776 mm |