1992 Renault 19 vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Volvo PV 60 (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (78 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1946 Volvo PV 60 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 625 kg more than 1992 Renault 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Renault 19 | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | 19 | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2850 mm |
