1992 Renault 19 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault 19 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (90 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 824 kg more than 1992 Renault 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault 19. (142 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Renault 19 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 19 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1096 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 87 L |
