1992 Renault 19 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault 19 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Renault 19. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault 19. (181 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Renault 19 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Renault | Citroen |
Model | 19 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 181 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |