1992 Renault 19 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault 19 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault 19. (142 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Renault 19 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | 19 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |