1992 Renault Alpine vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Alpine would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Renault Alpine (251 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Renault Alpine should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1992 Renault Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Renault Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Renault Alpine | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | Alpine | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2975 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 143 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2490 mm |
