1992 Renault Clio vs. 1979 Subaru Rex
To start off, 1992 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Subaru Rex. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Subaru Rex would be higher. At 1,107 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Renault Clio (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1979 Subaru Rex. (29 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1979 Subaru Rex. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Renault Clio weights approximately 275 kg more than 1979 Subaru Rex. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Subaru Rex is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Subaru Rex. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Renault Clio (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Subaru Rex. (42 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Subaru Rex.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Renault Clio | 1979 Subaru Rex | |
Make | Renault | Subaru |
Model | Clio | Rex |
Year Released | 1992 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 1107 cc | 543 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 29 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 42 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |