1992 Renault Clio vs. 2001 Rover 75

To start off, 2001 Rover 75 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1992 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1992 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Clio. 2001 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 1992 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1992 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: