1992 Renault Clio vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1992 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 660 kg more than 1992 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Renault Clio | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
| Make | Renault | Suzuki |
| Model | Clio | Kizashi |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 1107 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 48 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1471 mm |
