1992 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 194 more horse power than 1992 Renault Clio. (48 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Clio.
Because 2011 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Clio. (81 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Renault Clio | 2011 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Renault | Holden |
| Model | Clio | UTE |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Size | 1107 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 48 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
