1992 Renault Express vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1992 Renault Express is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 415 kg more than 1992 Renault Express.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Express, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Renault Express | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Renault | Riley |
| Model | Express | RM A |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2870 mm |
