1992 Renault Racoon vs. 1967 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1992 Renault Racoon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Triumph 1300 (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Triumph 1300 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Renault Racoon weights approximately 87 kg more than 1967 Triumph 1300.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Triumph 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Renault Racoon (107 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm). This means 1992 Renault Racoon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Renault Racoon | 1967 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | Racoon | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 918 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2460 mm |
