1992 Renault Racoon vs. 2000 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2000 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota RAV4 (146 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota RAV4 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota RAV4 (200 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota RAV4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Renault Racoon | 2000 Toyota RAV4 | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Racoon | RAV4 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1275 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2500 mm |
