1992 Renault Racoon vs. 2001 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2001 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki Baleno (85 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Renault Racoon weights approximately 90 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Baleno.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Suzuki Baleno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Renault Racoon (107 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki Baleno. (103 Nm). This means 1992 Renault Racoon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Renault Racoon | 2001 Suzuki Baleno | |
| Make | Renault | Suzuki |
| Model | Racoon | Baleno |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 915 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2490 mm |
