1992 Rover 100 1.4 D vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Rover | Triumph |
| Model | 100 1.4 D | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1358 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 89 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
