1992 Rover 100 1.4 D vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 419 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Arosa (117 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2000 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Rover | Seat |
Model | 100 1.4 D | Arosa |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 89 Nm | 117 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1289 kg |