1992 Rover 100 1.4 D vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2000 Smart Roadster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 1,358 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart Roadster (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart Roadster weights approximately 15 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Smart Roadster (110 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2000 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
| Make | Rover | Smart |
| Model | 100 1.4 D | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1358 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 89 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 66.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 67 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1200 mm |
