1992 Rover 100 1.4 D vs. 2012 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2012 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Sequoia (310 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1705 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Sequoia (443 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2012 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | 2012 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 100 1.4 D | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1358 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 89 Nm | 443 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 2575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1956 mm |
