1992 Rover 100 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 179 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100. (135 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Rover 100 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Rover | Holden |
| Model | 100 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
