1992 Rover 100 vs. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser
To start off, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (260 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser weights approximately 980 kg more than 1992 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (367 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Rover 100 | 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 100 | FJ Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 367 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4671 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1811 mm |
