1992 Rover 100 vs. 2011 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2011 Toyota Tundra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 462 kg more than 1992 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Rover 100 | 2011 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 100 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 381 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1332 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1940 mm |
