1992 Rover 100 vs. 2013 Ford EDGE
To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford EDGE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford EDGE (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford EDGE weights approximately 970 kg more than 1992 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford EDGE (343 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford EDGE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Rover 100 | 2013 Ford EDGE | |
Make | Rover | Ford |
Model | 100 | EDGE |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4679 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2223 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1702 mm |