1992 Rover 216 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1992 Rover 216. (122 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 216. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 863 kg more than 1992 Rover 216. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 216. (140 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 216.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Rover 216 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 216 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 87 L |