1992 Rover 216 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (201 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1992 Rover 216. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 216. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 485 kg more than 1992 Rover 216. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 1992 Rover 216 has manual transmission. 1992 Rover 216 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Rover 216 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Rover | Kia |
Model | 216 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 201 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2845 mm |