1992 Rover 216 vs. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder (187 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1992 Rover 216. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 216.
Because 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Rover 216. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder has automatic transmission and 1992 Rover 216 has manual transmission. 1992 Rover 216 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Rover 216 | 2010 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Rover | Nissan |
| Model | 216 | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 187 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4884 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |
