1992 Rover 216 vs. 2011 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2011 Toyota Highlander is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Highlander (280 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1992 Rover 216. (122 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 216. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1992 Rover 216. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Rover 216. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Rover 216 | 2011 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 216 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4796 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |