1992 Rover 220 vs. 2005 Saturn L
To start off, 2005 Saturn L is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 220 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saturn L (182 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1992 Rover 220. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saturn L weights approximately 315 kg more than 1992 Rover 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saturn L (258 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 220. (180 Nm). This means 2005 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 220.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Rover 220 | 2005 Saturn L | |
Make | Rover | Saturn |
Model | 220 | L |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1153 kg | 1468 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 59 L |