1992 Rover 220 vs. 2012 Audi Q3
To start off, 2012 Audi Q3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 220 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 138 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2012 Audi Q3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Rover 220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi Q3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 220. (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Audi Q3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 220.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Rover 220 | 2012 Audi Q3 | |
Make | Rover | Audi |
Model | 220 | Q3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1600 mm |