1992 Rover 400 vs. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara (165 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1992 Rover 400. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 234 kg more than 1992 Rover 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara (220 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 400. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Rover 400 | 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | Rover | Suzuki |
Model | 400 | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2490 mm |