1992 Rover 620i vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 620i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 620i would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1992 Rover 620i. (113 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 620i.
Because 2009 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 620i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 620i. (172 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 620i.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Rover 620i | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Rover | Holden |
Model | 620i | Commodore |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |