1992 Rover 800 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 800 would be higher. At 2,675 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Rover 800 (167 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Rover 800 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 800. (225 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 800. 1992 Rover 800 has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Rover 800 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Rover 800 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Rover | Holden |
| Model | 800 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2675 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 225 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
