1992 Rover Mini vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover Mini would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1992 Rover Mini. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover Mini.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover Mini. (89 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Rover Mini | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Mini | 3 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 89 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 55 L |
