1992 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2010 Volvo S80 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S80 (311 HP @ 5950 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1992 Toyota 4Runner. (112 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1992 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S80 weights approximately 277 kg more than 1992 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo S80 (440 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Toyota 4Runner. (192 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | 4Runner | S80 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2366 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5950 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1602 kg | 1879 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1494 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2835 mm |