1992 Toyota Blizzard vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Blizzard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Blizzard would be higher. At 2,444 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Toyota Blizzard is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1992 Toyota Blizzard. (76 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Toyota Blizzard.
Because 1992 Toyota Blizzard is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Blizzard will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Toyota Blizzard. (167 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Toyota Blizzard.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Toyota Blizzard | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Toyota | Mazda |
Model | Blizzard | 3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2444 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |