1992 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 155 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Toyota Lite Ace | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
Model | Lite Ace | Polo |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 945 kg |