1992 Toyota Sera vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1992 Toyota Sera is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Toyota Sera (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Sera should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1992 Toyota Sera.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Toyota Sera. (132 Nm). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Toyota Sera.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Toyota Sera | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Sera | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.9 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.1 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
