1992 Toyota Sera vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Sera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Sera would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1992 Toyota Sera. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Toyota Sera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 401 kg more than 1992 Toyota Sera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Toyota Sera. (132 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Toyota Sera.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Toyota Sera | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Toyota | Mazda |
Model | Sera | 3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1301 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2639 mm |