1992 Volkswagen Passat vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volkswagen Passat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volkswagen Passat would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1992 Volkswagen Passat has manual transmission. 1992 Volkswagen Passat will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Volkswagen Passat | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Volkswagen | Jaguar |
Model | Passat | XF |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1877 mm |