1992 Volvo 245 vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 245 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Volvo 245 (116 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 2. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 245 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 2.
Because 1992 Volvo 245 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Volvo 245. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Volvo 245 (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 2. (119 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Volvo 245 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Volvo 245 | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Volvo | Mazda |
| Model | 245 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2489 mm |
