1992 Volvo 480 vs. 2011 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2011 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 480. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 480 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Cadillac Escalade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Cadillac Escalade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 480, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1992 Volvo 480 has manual transmission. 1992 Volvo 480 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Volvo 480 | 2011 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Volvo | Cadillac |
Model | 480 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 403 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2946 mm |