1993 Acura Integra vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Acura Integra would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP) has 388 more horse power than 1993 Acura Integra. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1993 Acura Integra.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Acura Integra | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | Integra | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
