1993 Alpina B3 vs. 2009 Ford F-250
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Alpina B3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Alpina B3 would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1993 Alpina B3. (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1993 Alpina B3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Alpina B3 weights approximately 874 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Because 2009 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Alpina B3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-250 (495 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Alpina B3. (260 Nm). This means 2009 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Alpina B3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Alpina B3 | 2009 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Alpina | Ford |
| Model | B3 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 5399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 966 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3610 mm |
