1993 Alpina B6 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1993 Alpina B6. (238 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1993 Alpina B6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Alpina B6 (293 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1993 Alpina B6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Alpina B6 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
| Make | Alpina | Ford |
| Model | B6 | ST 460 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2752 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 460 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 293 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |
