1993 Alpine A 610 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Alpine A 610. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Alpine A 610 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Alpine A 610 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Alpine A 610 (247 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Alpine A 610 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 136 kg more than 1993 Alpine A 610.
Because 1993 Alpine A 610 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Alpine A 610. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Alpine A 610 (357 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Alpine A 610 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Alpine A 610 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A 610 | 6 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 2486 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1414 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |