1993 Aston Martin Virage vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Aston Martin Virage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Aston Martin Virage would be higher.
Because 1993 Aston Martin Virage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Aston Martin Virage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Aston Martin Virage. (451 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Aston Martin Virage.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Aston Martin Virage | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Holden |
Model | Virage | XU 6 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 344 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 451 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |