1993 Audi 80 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1993 Audi 80 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1993 Audi 80. (131 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1993 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 825 kg more than 1993 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Audi 80 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 80 | 62 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2195 kg |