1993 Audi 80 vs. 1999 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1993 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Audi 80 (131 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Audi 80 | 1999 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1993 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |