1993 Audi 80 vs. 2002 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 712 more horse power than 1993 Audi 80. (131 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1993 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Audi 80 weights approximately 284 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2002 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 800 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Audi 80 | 2002 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Audi | Lotec |
| Model | 80 | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1086 kg |
