1993 Audi S2 vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Audi S2 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1993 Audi S2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Audi S2 (227 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2010 Acura CSX. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Audi S2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Audi S2 weights approximately 160 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Audi S2 | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Audi | Acura |
Model | S2 | CSX |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |